American Troops Quotes

American Troops Quote of the day

So such an American troops presence in Korea in the South and Japan, total some 100,000 should stay there forever, even after unification of Korean peninsula.

Many of the vicious criminals held there have been caught on the battlefield fighting against American troops and shutting down Guantanamo Bay would just require the military to move them elsewhere.

Three years into the war, tens of thousands of American troops remain targets of a growing Iraqi insurgency.

Conventional wisdom holds that setting a timetable for getting American troops out of Iraq would be a mistake.

Our firm view is that the president has no legal authority, none whatsoever, to commit American troops to war in the Persian Gulf or anywhere else without congressional authorization.

So one important lesson of Vietnam is, the first casualty of an unwise and unjust war are the American troops called on to fight it. Their service should be honored.

The terrorist threat to American troops has decreased in some ways because there's not 175,000 in a dangerous part of the world. There's only 15,000.

American troops have not only occupied Ulster but are arriving in increasing numbers in England.

Forty-five percent of Iraqi citizens think it is morally okay to attack American troops.

I can say, and I am responsible for what I am saying, that [American troops] have started to commit suicide under the walls of Baghdad. We will encourage them to commit more suicides quickly.

I sent American troops to Iraq to make its people free, not to make them American. Iraqis will write their own history and find their own way.

It was helpful to have the American troops there in great strength. They knew there'd be consequences if they didn't move back. Now, there has been some removal of the foreign forces.

Once again, President Clinton is using American troops to deflect attention from his record of lies, distortions, obstructions of justice and abuse of power.

We saw the president of the United States engage American troops in a fourth conflict in a foreign land. This is historic.

I don't agree that you need an enormous number of American troops. Saddam's army is down to one-third than it was before, and I think it would be a cakewalk.

I think the American people should know there's already strong influences toward another deployment of American troops in an open-ended commitment.

It's fair to say average Americans think that the average Afghan doesn't want American troops in their country.

American troops and American taxpayers are shouldering a huge burden with no end in sight because Mr. Bush took us to war on false premises and with no plan to win the peace.

The only way that American troops could have stayed in Iraq is to get an agreement from the then-Iraqi government that would have protected our troops, and the Iraqi government would not give that.

Absolutely without firing a shot and instead of 175,000 American troops deployed overseas we now have 15,000.

A troop surge in Baghdad would put more American troops at risk to address a problem that is not a military problem.

The administration does not agree with those who suggest we should deploy hundreds of thousands of American troops to engage militarily in a ground war in Iraq.

We don't have enough American troops inside of Iraq to destroy ISIL any time soon.

If we are going to commit American troops, we must be certain they have a clear mission, an achievable goal and an exit strategy.

George W. Bush made the agreement about when American troops would leave Iraq, not Barack Obama.