Nuclear Weapons Quotes

Both [Donald] Trump and Hillary [Clinton] want bigger military budgets and Hillary supports President Obama's one trillion dollar expenditure to so-called upgrade nuclear weapons. P

Women don't go to war to kill other women. Wars and armies and nuclear weapons are essentially heterosexual hobbies.

We call on all members of America's religious communities, as a testament of our common faith, to join Faithful Security, and to take action immediately to break faith with nuclear weapons.

If ants had nuclear weapons, they would probably end the world in a week.

Unfortunately, nuclear weapons have become identified with state power.

Nuclear Weapons merit unequivocal and unhesitating condemnation

The world should contemplate a nuclear weapons-armed Iran with the greatest of concern.

If the United States wants to prevent other countries from acquiring the bomb, it must be prepared to reduce and eventually end its own reliance on nuclear weapons.

A man you can bait with a Tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons.

We are plunging headlong into a cold war, and we have 2,000 nuclear weapons on hair-trigger alert.

We do know, with absolute certainty, that Saddam Hussein is using his procurement system to acquire the equipment he needs in order to enrich uranium to build a nuclear weapon.

My short-term vision is the abolition of nuclear weapons. My long-term vision is the abolition of war.

Proliferation of fanatical religious terrorists with safe harbors in broken countries, and the means to obtain and the will to use nuclear, chemical and biological weapons on our soil.

...nuclear threats and nuclear weapons are the last argument of weak, stressed and irresponsible politicians. People must act very quicky to stop the movement to nuclear war.

The American government is making nuclear weapons like there's no tomorrow.

On many issues, including on the use of nuclear weapons, it is not clear where [Donald] Trump stands, due to his contradictory statements.

If you don't believe ... Saddam Hussein is a threat with nuclear weapons, then you shouldn't vote for me.

All nations that have nuclear weapons think that they are responsible and it is the other guys who are irresponsible.

Obviously, we don't want Iran to have nuclear weapons and I don't know if they're developing them, but if they're not developing them, they're crazy.

There is only one way to get rid of nuclear weapons... use them.

I will confine myself to reaffirming the Israel will not be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons to the region.

It is my view that there is no sensible military use for nuclear weapons, whether "strategic" weapons, "tactical" weapons, "theatre" weapons, weapons at sea or weapons in space.

The implied threat of using nuclear weapons to curb guerrillas was as absurd as to talk of using a sledge hammer to ward off a swarm of mosquitoes.

Countries are making nuclear weapons like there is no tomorrow.

The combination of extremist ideology, a warped understanding of reality and nuclear weapons is a combination that no-one in the international community can accept.

We have to prepare for the worst, and the worst is war.

If there was a market in mass-produced portable nuclear weapons, we'd market them, too.

We have evidence that Iran makes a reactor to possess nuclear weapons.

Mistakes are made in every other human endeavor. Why should nuclear weapons be exempt?

Iran won't pursue nuclear weapons because 'it's contrary to their faith.'

There was plenty of evidence that Saddam had nuclear weapons, by the way. That is not in dispute. There is plenty of evidence of that.

But beyond all that, the question that is continually begged is why isn't America leading the way toward total abolition of nuclear weapons.

I'd be the last one to use the nuclear weapons, because that's sort of like the end of the ballgame.

The single greatest problem the world has is nuclear armament, nuclear weapons, not global warming.

You have North Korea, you have nuclear weapons, and China could solve that problem. And they're not helping us at all.

If the Iranians were to have a nuclear weapon they could proliferate.

It has been the policy of the United States, Democrats and Republicans, to do everything we could to reduce the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

I have said publicly no option should be off the table, but I would certainly take nuclear weapons off the table.

Donald Trump is a person who has been very cavalier, even casual about the use of nuclear weapons.

After months of negotiations, Iran has finally agreed to reduce its nuclear weapons program. Which was great until Putin showed up and said, 'Hi, I'm here about Craigslist ad for nukes.'

The overall quantity of nuclear weapons in the world continues to decline slowly.

We are told that the possession of nuclear weapons - in some cases even the testing of these weapons - is essential for national security. But this argument can be made by other countries as well.

A.I. poses a potential threat more dangerous than nuclear weapons.

We reject the way the world is at the moment and we don't accept nuclear weapons

Generation after generation can't just be loaded with more and more nuclear weapons and not ultimately dance to that music.

Nuclear weapons can be dismantled, but they cannot be uninvented.

We still live in a world where if you have nuclear weapons, you are buying power; you are buying insurance against attack.

I feel relieved that we discovered that Iraq did not have nuclear weapons.

American nuclear weapons would almost certainly start being removed from Britain within 12 months of a Labour government gaining power.

In the future, if nuclear weapons are unleashed there will be no front and no rear.