Programs Quotes

Programs Quote of the day

It is our character that supports the promise of our future - far more than particular government programs or policies.

Liberals want to manage the damage with government programs to take care of those who have fallen between the cracks. Populists want to fix the cracks so that people don't fall in the first place.

The most important social welfare program in America is a job.

Let's be honest about this; the liberal agenda with failed stimulus plans and government entitlement programs is crippling our economy and our quality of life.

Well-fed people can enhance their dignity, their health and their learning capacity. Putting resources into social programs is not expenditure. It is investment.

The economic welfare of all our people must ultimately stem not from government programs, but from the wealth created by a vigorous private sector.

MBA programs are underwritten by large companies and they succeed at producing future employees of large companies. In that regard, they are doing exactly what they are supposed to be doing.

No one asked me to be an actor, so no one owed me. There was no entitlement.

There's no conflict between the social-welfare state and open markets.

How we treat the earth basically effects our social welfare and our national security.

While Trump keeps the spotlight on himself, the "respectable" Republican establishment chips away at government programs that benefit the general population.

My great objective as a parliamentarian was to dramatise the deficiencies and devise practical government programs to deal with them. It was a cause that went to the heart of our way of life.

The best reason to diminish social programs is not to put more money in people's pockets but to put more responsibility in people's pockets.

I left Delhi, in 1971, shortly after Collective Choice and Social Welfare was published in 1970.

I think of these imperial adventures like welfare programs; you start them with all good intentions, they never end, they go on forever and get more expensive as they go on.

Only those who are ideologically opposed to military programs think of the defense budget as the first and best place to get resources for social welfare needs.

By finding waste and abuse in entitlement programs, and eliminating it, we can ensure that the funds that are put into these programs go to the people that need them the most.

When you talk about entitlement programs, it's not just about - it's not about cutting those programs. It is about saving those programs. Those programs are on a path of fiscal unsustainability.

There's a smokestack on the back of every government program.

Pugsley's First Law of Government: All government programs accomplish the opposite of what they are designed to achieve.

Americans must either choose big government and be willing to pay for and submit to it, or they must move toward smaller, less intrusive government and be willing to enjoy fewer government programs.

What I'd like to do is be able to work with Democrats to reform current entitlement programs for future generations, grandfathering all the grandparents.

Many health care providers, particularly physicians in rural and urban areas, are leaving the Government programs because of inadequate reimbursement rates.

Taking money from job creating entrepreneurs and giving it to ever-failing government programs has to be the ultimate in economic illiteracy.

In some instances, alimony has become akin to a social-welfare program provided by working women to their ex-husbands.

I think anyone that thought that we were coming in as a bunch of liberal Democrats to deliver more large-scale social programs was nuts. I sure didn't expect it.

Unchecked, government social programs are a security threat because they weaken the ultimate line of defense: the free-born citizen whose responsibilities are not subcontracted to the government.

A hundred welfare programs, spending more and more billions, lead to chronic budget deficits, which lead to increased paper-money issues, which lead to higher prices.

Social-impact partnerships address our moral responsibilities to ensure that social programs actually improve recipients lives, and to do so in a fiscally prudent manner.

Every effort needs to be made to try and offset the costs of Katrina and Rita by reductions in other government programs, especially those that are wasteful, duplicative and ineffective.

After all, we are not promoting welfare. We are promoting work. We are not pushing for more entitlement programs. We are pushing for more enterprise. We are not trying re-distribute existing wealth.

I'm not asking for more entitlement programs; I'm asking for more enterprise.

I don't like a lot of social programs either because it makes you non-productive.

Cliven Bundy is breaking the law. He's breaking the law and he wants all of us to pay for his cattle while he's ranting about people who are part of social welfare programs.

Obama behaves like a centrist who leans tentatively left on certain social programs but boldly right on military force and civil liberties.

We want to make sure that Social Security is fixed for those people who have had that promise and there's something in the future for our younger workers. And we're not about to do a welfare program.

Free enterprise has done more to reduce poverty than all the government programs dreamed up by Democrats.

The only time you can have maximum economic progress is when social programs don't exist.

The only things that are immortal in this world are government programs and cancer cells in petri dishes.

As more people rely on government programs, the harder it becomes to conduct the necessary reforms to preserve them to help our society's most vulnerable.

Getting the government to put money into social programs run by religious institutions is a practice that started during the Clinton years, when Bill Clinton advocated the AmeriCorps program.

In Michigan, a liberal democrat raised taxes and kept their government programs at the same level. And guess what? Their economy continued into the toilet, it continued down.

The rationale for the vast network of government welfare programs as well as regulation and control over private enterprise is based on the socialist analysis of the market economy.

Look at government programs for the past fifty years. Every single one - except warfare - achieved the exact opposite of its announced goal.

Hard-core results come from igniting the massive power of emotional commitment. Are your people committed?

We are constantly evolving as we are interacting with the world. Mindfulness and growth mindset drives our evolution faster and on right tracks.

When you don’t know what true for you, everyone else has unusual influence.

Your comfort zone is a place where you keep yourself in a self-illusion and nothing can grow there but your potentiality can grow only when you can think and grow out of that zone.

REJECTION is kind of your negative ILLUSION which has no value but it’s give you a CLUE to go for next level of your ACTION.

How you think and create your inner world that you gonna become in your outer world. Your inner believe manifest you in the outside