Voters Quotes

The establishment is divorcing itself from its base - from voters who are choosing a candidate who says he stands for things that are anathema to the establishment.

The lesson is that voters in both parties are in a very anti-establishment, populist mood. Hillary Clinton is the establishment candidate.

Republican voters are coalescing behind [Donald] Trump, but many Republican elected officials still say they can't support him.

We have seen voters denied their rights in recent elections as they have been incorrectly purged from lists, their absentee votes not counted, and voting machine integrity and security not assured.

There's no question that many factors contribute to voters' perceptions about debates and who wins and who loses.

I think that the message I have of optimism and hope about Britain's bright future outside the European Union is shared by many Conservative members and voters - indeed by a majority of the country.

History shows that there is no more potent engine for reform than the passion of voters who feel betrayed by the politicians they hoped would do the right thing.

There's been a lot of study of the demographics this year that could decide this election [2016] and a lot of money being spent targeting voters who could tip the vote.

They (voters) want to know what's the truth. They're not interested in a chameleon.

Raised some taxes based on court orders and voter approval.

Improved AR roads, via voter-approved tax increase.

Every voter became Narendra Modi.

Every voter is a Bharat Bhagya Vidhata.

Voters' memories will fade some.

It's important not to demonize [Donald's] Trump voters.

A huge portion of Trump voters are incredibly pleased with how he's performing. They see what they want to see.

I think there are real possibilities of reaching out to many of the Trump voters, those who voted for Obama believing his rhetoric.

The voter does not vote only on one issue, the voter votes on a multiplicity of issues.

Then there's politics. Just imagine politics with its dumbbell element subtracted. There would be no Republican candidates. There would be no Democratic voters. The whole system would collapse.

At some point, don't voters start to see all of public life as one big polluted river? And if they do, don't they stop saying things like "That's a busted tire floating by" and "That's an old shoe"?

You see that gap is exactly how they can marginalize and exclude people from giving the voters more voices and choices.

The response is to the image, not to the man, since 99 percent of the voters have no contact with the man.

It's not what's there that counts, it's what's projected and?it's not what he projects but rather what the voter receives? It's not the man we have to change, but rather the received impression.

Local television and local TV news isn't telling the voters about local candidates.

Many now born, by the time they are voters will compose part of a nation with a genius nowhere equaled, and with a vast territory upon which those energies and that genius can operate.

I got a feeling that after six years of disappointment, of mediocrity and decline, a slow course correction is not what voters are going to be looking for in 2016.

The election process is a total fraud. If voters believe the process is secret, they will vote. If not, they will not.

I'd make a better U.S. president than George W. Bush. Bush is an idiot. I'm a better public speaker than him. It makes you wonder about the voters.

One of the things that's very troubling to voters about Donald Trump is his erratic behavior, his lack of good temperament to serve as commander in chief.

Under our system every voter and officeholder is a man who has demonstrated through voluntary and difficult service that he places the welfare of the group ahead of personal advantage.

Voters might have short memories. Politicians do not.

A presidential debate is a job interview. And voters look for certain traits in people applying to be president.

Obama still has work to do with the vision thing. Convincing voters that he has a credible, practical plan to turn the nation around is a process, not a speech.

In times of tumult, voters are likely to forgive a president, if not reward him, for compromises made in service of solutions.

Don't underestimate questions from the crowd; technology has made voters more informed than ever.

Obama ran a hard-edged and negative campaign against Romney, hoping to convince recession-weary voters that his rival was unworthy of the job.

American voters should understand that Congress will always find a way to spend every last dollar sent to Washington.

I'm not saying Donald Trump voters are a cult at all. I'm saying the attitude of implicit trust, people don't trust politicians like that, and yet a lot of people will profess blanket trust of Trump.

Republican voters are fed up with Democrats and Democrat policy.

The American people - Republican voters especially - are fed up with the status quo.

The Republican Party seems just as eager as the Democrats to pronounce their voters as extreme kooks.

The way Obama voters and non-Obama voters deal with unemployment are a very different.

Not getting rid of [Donald] Trump because there's a slew of Republican voters that don't want to get rid of Trump.

The Republicans want illegal immigrants for different reasons. They want 'em for cheap labor. Democrats want 'em for voters. Well, Republicans would like that too.

Republican primary voters, whether they're close primaries or open, are voting for anybody but candidates attached to the Republican establishment.

We try it practically every time it comes up, be it amnesty, be it any other issue they want. We try and it gets us nowhere, and it doesn't get us any favors among left-wing-inclined voters, either.

The Democrats have made the low-information voters think they care about 'em. And the worst thing you can do is invest in the Democrat Party, the worst thing, in terms of life potential.

Every time a Republican wins the White House, whenever Republicans win control of Congress, the Drive-Bys always claim that the message is voters want a balanced and divided government.

We live in a country where power changes hands cyclically, because everybody in power screws up at some point, or the voters get fickle and just want a change.

Legal immigration is a much tougher group of people to stereotype and to identify as potential new Democrat voters.