Wmd Quotes

Wmd Quote of the day

We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.

Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States.

We know where they are. They are in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad.

Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.

We know where they are [Iraq's weapons of mass destruction]. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.

Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement

We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more.

We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam's goal is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed.

Nuclear proliferation - the proliferation of WMDs altogether - is one of the greatest dangers of our time.

The number of people killed by the sanctions in Iraq is greater than the total number of people killed by all weapons of mass destruction in all of history.

Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people.

Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.

No one has done what Saddam Hussein has done, or is thinking of doing. He is producing weapons of mass destruction, and he is qualitatively and quantitatively different from other dictators.

So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real.

We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.

There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed.

There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years, and he could have it earlier.

The intelligence is clear: (Saddam) continues to believe his WMD programme is essential both for internal repression and for external aggression.

Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.

One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.

We know for a fact that there are weapons there.

Iran is actively pursuing the development of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles.

If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program.

I have no doubt we're going to find big stores of weapons of mass destruction.

Given time, given the number of prisoners now that we're interrogating, I'm confident that we're going to find weapons of mass destruction.

He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.

In April 1991, after the Gulf war, Iraq was given 15 days to provide a full and final declaration of all its WMD.

One of our top objectives is to find and destroy the WMD. There are a number of sites.

Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.

We never believed that we'd just tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that country.

So has the strategic decision been made to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction by the leadership in Baghdad? I think our judgment has to be clearly not.

U.S. officials never expected that 'we were going to open garages and find' weapons of mass destruction.

I'm absolutely sure that there are weapons of mass destruction there and the evidence will be forthcoming. We're just getting it just now.

I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction.

They may have had time to destroy them, and I don't know the answer.

Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.

I'm not surprised if we begin to uncover the weapons program of Saddam Hussein - because he had a weapons program.

If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world.

The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.

The claims made about Iraq's WMD capabilities before the invasion were inaccurate, wrong, and in some cases, deliberately misleading.

Saddam's removal is necessary to eradicate the threat from his weapons of mass destruction

Before people crow about the absence of weapons of mass destruction, I suggest they wait a bit.

If the thumbnail version of the Iraq war was that Bush lied about WMD, the thumbnail version of Obama's war in Afghanistan is that the generals pushed him into a war he didn't want to fight.

Israel has WMD, and it has to sign [chemical warfare agreement], and Israel is occupying our land, so that's we talked about the Middle East, not Syria, not Israel ; it should be comprehensive.

I am confident that we will find evidence that makes it clear he had weapons of mass destruction.

We are against any WMD, any weapons of mass destruction, whether chemical or nuclear.

The truth is not being aired in the West. It’s a surreal perversion of history that’s going on once again, as in Bush pre-Iraq ‘WMD’ campaign.

Sooner or later, jihadist-style terror and WMD are going to come together and the consequences could be horrendous.

I'm saying that the WMD reporting was not consciously evil. It was bad journalism, even very bad journalism.