After the Second World War, people in Japan no longer died for their country, and even that expression was no longer used.

The current situation of the earthquake, tsunami and the nuclear plants is in a way the most severe crisis in the 65 years since World War II.

The trend in the world right now is - not just in developed countries, but in developing countries including China and India - there is a movement to build more and more nuclear plants.

If you are unable to understand the cause of a problem it is impossible to solve it.

In fact, the Senkaku Islands are... inherent territory of Japan that is recognized in our history and also by international law.

So, Japan as a country has lost its vigor, it feels very much closed in for various reasons.

Nuclear arms and atomic power represent a technology in which coexistence with man is extremely difficult.

When the world has 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 nuclear plants, can we call that a safe world? I think we need to properly have this debate.

The safest nuclear power or energy policy is to realize 'zero nuclear power.

It is possible for Japan to become the model of a society that does not rely on nuclear power.

This quake, tsunami and the nuclear accident are the biggest crises for Japan [in decades] ... We will continue to handle it in a state of maximum alert.

Men will clutch at illusions when they have nothing else to hold to.

We have never been outnumbered, we have only been out organized.

You don't have to force anyone to Trust You they just do and give away there Heart, Soul and Body to You Only if they really Love you and Mean the world to Them

Let us have wine and woman mirth and laughter. Sermons and soda-water the day after.

Just shred baby, shred.

Increasingly, America is biblically illiterate.

I influence people, hopefully on the positive side.

Being rich and famous seems to have its ups and downs. That's the price you pay for being troubadours and clowns.

Days and rivers are the same; they both flow to the unknown oceans!

I'm not sitting in judgment on whether or not libertarians can participate in a political process whose very nature they oppose.