Nobody gets argued all the way into becoming a believer on the sheer basis of logic and reason. That requires a leap of faith.

The God of the Bible is also the God of the genome. He can be worshipped in the cathedral or in the laboratory. His creation is majestic, awesome, intricate, and beautiful.

God is most certainly not threatened by science; He made it all possible.

Evolution, as a mechanism, can be and must be true. But that says nothing about the nature of its author. For those who believe in God, there are reasons now to be more in awe, not less.

By committing the scientific method to religious claims you're committing a logical fallacy

I think God appreciates that we appreciate his creation.

I believe in the literal rising of the body of Christ. It's the cornerstone of my Christian faith.

Faith is not the opposite of reason. Faith rests squarely upon reason, but with the added component of revelation.

Scientists must venture outside their comfort zones to show the public how cool - and how important - their work really is.

The blooming of a flower is, in my mind, not a miracle. It's something that we can understand on the basis of molecular biology these days.

Proponents of intelligent design don't accept that some of the very complex nanomachines that we have inside ourselves could have come about solely on the basis of natural selection.

I have never felt that anything really mattered but knowing that you stood for the things in which you believed and had done the very best you could.

There is nothing wrong in saying something, but there should be no protection [insistence] that we are right.

Reproach is usually honest, which is more than can be said of praise.

Science is the knowledge of constant things, not merely of passing events, and is properly less the knowledge of general laws than of existing facts.

Our architecture reflects truly as a mirror.

I classify myself as a student and a teacher. This year, I'm back into the student. I try to stay balanced. I learn so much every time I walk about my door.

That is a question we cannot answer before, or even during, the trials. Only when we have overcome them do we understand why they were there.

The Court today holds the Congress may say that some of the poor are too poor even to go bankrupt. I cannot agree.

... we do not remember people as they were. What we remember is the effect they had on us then, but we remember it through an emotion charged with all that has since happened to us.