There are cases in which somebody has demonstrated just such an outrageous disregard for the bounds of an acceptable decision that you want a measure of accountability.

I personally think that we should be extremely reluctant to use a recall mechanism for an unpopular decision simply because of the message it sends about judicial independence.

Lawyers like to leave no stone unturned, provided they can charge by the stone.

If that were a winning argument, Donald Trump could get anybody off the bench on his cases by just something deeply offensive based on their background.

There have been so many examples of highly qualified judges of enormous integrity who lost their positions because they were in fact disabled from speaking out to defend a controversial opinion.

Individuals because of their identity can't render an impartial judgment is just deeply offensive and contrary to all the ideals of the judicial system that we value.

We don't want to disqualify individuals who are selected partly because they bring that diverse experience to the court in cases where that experience is most likely to make a difference.

Whenever you feel hatred to your loved ones, start thinking about the love you felt once for your beloved.

Idris: Are all people like this?The Doctor: Like what?Idris: So much bigger on the inside.

A man don't always have to eat what he's standing life. If he wants, a man can fix a meal of his own choosing.

Why did this disease choose me? I cannot carry it, if its just for the word: Fate.

Use encouragement. Make the fault seem easy to correct.

When you do not have the basic requirements for survival and safety and belongingness and where there are huge inequities then fear turns into hatred.

I'm finding that success is way more time-consuming than failure ever was.

I think the most un-American thing you can say is, 'You can't say that.'

President Obama and the congressional Democrats have certainly been responsive.

A good song reminds us what we're fighting for.