You can justify, from a political standpoint, any type of violence you want to use.

If someone is killing, on a regular basis, thousands of animals, and if that person can only be stopped in one way by the use of violence, then it is certainly a morally justifiable solution.

If (a particular researcher) won't stop when you ask nicely, when you picket in front of his house, or when you burn his car, maybe he'll stop when you hit him over the head with a two-by-four.

If killing [animal research scientists] is the only way to stop them, then I said killing them would certainly be justified.

I don’t have any doubt in my mind that there will come a time when we will see violence against animal rights abusers.

I think for five lives, 10 lives, 15 human lives, we could save a million, two million, 10 million non-human lives.

If they won't stop when you ask them nicely, they don't stop when you demonstrate to them what they're doing is wrong, then they should be stopped using whatever means are necessary.

Fear is an effective factor in altering behavior.

Whatever it takes to stop someone from abusing animals is certainly morally acceptable

The inconvenience and the suffering of any children or any family members pales in comparison to the suffering and oppression that goes on in these animal laboratories.

I am personally not advocating violence. I am simply saying that it is a morally acceptable tactic and it may be useful in the struggle for animal liberation. I don't know.

CLEMENTINE: This is it, Joel. It's going to be gone soon.JOEL: I know.CLEMENTINE: What do we do?JOEL: Enjoy it.

My body felt alive. I need more. "Valkyrie, " Fen growled, eyes locked on my mouth. "Put your lips back on mine, and I will give you what you crave.

I love the ride of life.

For my family to go on living the way they are living now I can't just die. I've got to die accidentally.

No man will succeed unless he is ready to face and overcome difficulties and is prepared to assume responsibilities.

. . . peace is a thing which a person must be willing to fight for . . .

The concept of marriage must have been thought up by an unimaginative pig.

Bill Gates has become the patron saint of philanthropy and the poster child of rebirth, and from what I can tell, rightly so.

Not believing in the glory of our own soul is what the Vedanta calls atheism.

We need laws written by people who have confronted life in the real world, not in the sheltered world of trust fund recipients of the insulated cocoon of academia.